<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Dear Robofont community,</p>
<p dir="auto">I wanted to install and try the probably brilliant batch saving extension from Frederik Berlaen … but I fear it’s not supporting Robofont 3.1? Thought that’s the version I get from <a href="http://robofont.com" rel="nofollow">robofont.com</a>?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for clarifying.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/topic/521/batch-extension-for-generating-e-g-webfonts-for-latest-version-of-robofont</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:15:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.robofont.com/topic/521.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:41:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont? on Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:16:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Dear Robofont community,</p>
<p dir="auto">I wanted to install and try the probably brilliant batch saving extension from Frederik Berlaen … but I fear it’s not supporting Robofont 3.1? Thought that’s the version I get from <a href="http://robofont.com" rel="nofollow">robofont.com</a>?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for clarifying.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/post/1755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.robofont.com/post/1755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fooness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:16:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont? on Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:26:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It’s possible that the latest Batch does not work in RF3.1, as the variable font internals are changing rapidly.</p>
<p dir="auto">However the latest <a href="https://github.com/typemytype/batchRoboFontExtension" rel="nofollow">Batch</a> should work fine with the latest <a href="http://robofont.com/downloads/#beta-releases" rel="nofollow">RF 3.2 beta.</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/post/1756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.robofont.com/post/1756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[frederik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:26:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont? on Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:46:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thank you for the link to the beta versions! I’ll download the latest and try Batch with that version.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/post/1764</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.robofont.com/post/1764</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fooness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:46:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont? on Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:13:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Works like a charm! I’d like to ask one more thing which I’m not sure about.</p>
<p dir="auto">When generating WOFF or WOFF2, there’s a checkbox for either OTF ot TTF. TTF is selected by default. Why? How would I choose the one or the other? Intuitively I would definitely go for OTF.</p>
<p dir="auto">I tried to search the internet for it, but couldn’t find any matching results.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/post/1765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.robofont.com/post/1765</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fooness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:13:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Batch extension (for generating e.g. webfonts) for latest version of Robofont? on Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:15:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Batch supports both flavors inside a woff. It’s up to you to pick one, each of them has benefits and downsides.</p>
<p dir="auto">OTF will be close to the original while a TTF is mostly converted. A TTF flavored one can contain TTF hinting...</p>
<p dir="auto">Good luck</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.robofont.com/post/1768</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.robofont.com/post/1768</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[frederik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:15:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>